Where to begin? Well, why not get down to the nit-grit of what it is I do. Without trying to explain in exorbitant and mind numbing detail what it is I write and why and what I hope it effects, and who it will... blah blah blah... I'm just going to post some of my loglines (the one or two sentence pitch for a movie that summarizes the tension.) This way you'll get a taste. Then I'll follow up with snippets from some of my screenplays, short stories, etc.
I don't want to be too generous, but more will follow.
On another note, I'd like to mull over the time involved with any kind of scribe work. It is no easy task, and when one has too much time the projects can tend to stretch and stretch until the strength, and perhaps credibility, of that story can weaken to the point of absurdity. But should you just cram it all into a month, a week, a few days? No. Not unless you have to. Those who work on tv scripts have little choice in the matter. The demands of television are hyperkinetic, and in my opinion, in terms of content, overly dramatized. But, I suppose that's what people want. Hell, I used to watch Gray's Anatomy. I still watch Battlestar Galactica. So, I suppose I can't be hypocritical. After all, they have to cram a story arc, character development, and a seasonal plot movement all for a half hour or an hour, if the show happens to have a plot.
But what about novel writers? Or feature film writers? Or for short stories, and, hell, for poetry? Shouldn't one wait till it's absolutely perfect? Excuse me, but when is that? You can perfect the hell out of your story and still it may end up like shit. I've found, over these seven years, that perfection should not, not ever, be the goal. Instead, you should focus on gaining an understanding of when enough is enough. It's a sense of rhythm. A sense of structure, character, and action. Where does that come from? Could be intuitive, an instinctual knack. Could be learned through classes, workshops, comparisons, and just good old fashioned try and try again. Magic will not help here. And for the ever present, monstrous, glorious shadow of those who came before, what is called the Burden of the Past, well, that's difficult. If you think Goethe, Johnson, Keats, Hemingway, or even Shakespeare (whether he was one person or five) never had to practice their craft, never had to read or research, oh, well, you might want to get out now. First, if you're reading this blog, you're probably not of that god-like caliber. Second, even geniuses need practice. Mozart (I'm going musical now) indeed composed his first minuet at the wee age of 5 and played in front of a duke. Still, he learned much from his father, and more so still after. Raw talent is just that. Without refinement, without a constant shaping and reshaping of that "ore", as Keats called it, all the time in the world can't help, never mind perfect, a work of so called art.
P.S. Read the Greats. If you don't, you don't know what shadow you're standing in.
For me, I wrote false poems, like the rest, and thought them true because myself was true in writing them. -Elizabeth Barrett Browning
Thursday, September 11, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I like your idea of not striving for perfection. And I get it, too. It's the same with artwork -- you have to know when to walk away from it. It doesn't mean you can't go back to it, and the same goes for writing. Go back in time and see how many writers publish the same things over and over again just because they needed to do that extra tweaking. Can you say Henry James? I know I'm done for the moment when I'm content for the moment, and yes, it will change, but allowing it to is what makes me content with my work. Sorry, long rant, but I like when people think the way I do!
Looks like Casey already gave you props on the anti-perfectionist view, but I'll say it my way.
I've written many a poem, painted and drawn many a picture, but the ones that leave lasting impressions are the ones that were established in a flow. I know I have already failed when I set high expectations for a piece from the start because I get caught up in the details. Erasing and erasing again. Yes, things should be refined to an extent, but remember that there is always another piece of paper from which to begin.
I love the term "study" when used as a noun. This piece is a study of light through glass, this one, a study in portraiture. It never ceases to amaze me how much I learn by simply sitting down and drawing something new. I'm sure you feel the same way when you start writing something after reading a new author with a voice that just sticks.
Steal, steal away!
Post a Comment